One of the mechanisms of reproduction of chieftaincy conurbanero is, without doubt, the election system municipal council. The perpetuation of deliberative councils related is a central mechanism in this reprehensible practice undemocratic.
This territorial leaders held for decades, with one, two, three terms ... tremendous.
Let's see how this mechanism objectionable operates according to the model proposed research María Matilde Ollier, explicit in his book "Cuckoo's Nest. Buenos Aires in national politics -1916-2007 - , recently published University of San Martín and yesterday filed in the Book Fair.
Let us apply the model to the municipality of Morón and see how it perpetuates the Stalinist liberalism conurbanero: attentive readers of ramble that falls another myth. Va.
councilors to know how many correspond to each political party in Morón, divide the number of valid votes (issued) by the number of charges (number of councilors to cast): This division gives a number called repartidora figure (commonly known as "floor").
If have 100 total votes for the position of 10 aldermen, the number repartidora arising from dividing 100 by 10, which is 10. The number 10 indicates that 10 are needed votes for a party has a councilman.
Suppose now that the political parties involved have achieved the following votes: DTS in Morón Party majority, 22 votes, party B, 18 votes, Party C, 10 votes and the other 9 or less votes. To find out how many council members for each party will divide the votes obtained by each party by the number deliverer (ie 10).
This split a given in our hypothetical example: DTS Party two councilmen, a city councilman Party B, Party C a councilman, the rest either, because they have less than 10 votes and, as they say in the jargon of liberal, "will remain arafue, not reach the floor, hahaha. "
However, this division wins three council members but only seven are left undistributed (for the charges to cover recall are 10). So Sabbatella appeals to other cryptic pattern goes and wins a councilor for each party that has "waste."
In that case the party wins a councilman EDE more, because by dividing 22 by ten gives 2.2, Party B gets another additional council (18 / 10 = 1.8) and Party C nothing, having no rest (10/10 = 1), will this time without adding councilors, first scuffle progressive.
So far the numbers are now quite rare, but not yet fully conducive to Sabbatella as councilors at this stage primaera currendanga, are as follows: EDE 3, 2 Party B, Party C 1.
However, where it did make a difference in favor of liberal hegemonic party is in the following pattern. In the third manganeta disgraceful "legal" all councilors who have been awarded go directly to the ranks of the party that obtained the highest number of votes, the EDE in Morón.
is tremendous, and residue can be awarded only one councilor per game, if there are many games that do not reach "the floor" or deliverer figure, once distributed the residue which won the largest number of votes is with all councilors! Oh my god!
In our analysis, the EDE is with 7 aldermen, two party B, Party C with one. That is, the EDE achieved with 22 votes and 7 councilors Party B with 18, just 2. little bit!
So liberalism is handled, how nice ...! If Bertrand Russell saw!
Ps!
0 comments:
Post a Comment